tyranny and our duty

Magna Carta 1215 Article 61

[61] Since, moreover, for God and the betterment of our kingdom and for the better allaying of the discord that has arisen between us and our barons we have granted all these things aforesaid, wishing them to enjoy the use of them unimpaired and unshaken for ever, we give and grant them the under-written security, namely, that the barons shall choose any twenty-five barons of the kingdom they wish, who must with all their might observe, hold and cause to be observed, the peace and liberties which we have granted and confirmed to them by this present charter of ours, so that if we, or our justiciar, or our bailiffs or any one of our servants offend in any way against anyone or transgress any of the articles of the peace or the security and the offence be notified to four of the aforesaid twenty-five barons, those four barons shall come to us, or to our justiciar if we are out of the kingdom, and, laying the transgression before us, shall petition us to have that transgression corrected without delay. And if we do not correct the transgression, or if we are out of the kingdom, if our justiciar does not correct it, within forty days, reckoning from the time it was brought to our notice or to that of our justiciar if we were out of the kingdom, the aforesaid four barons shall refer that case to the rest of the twenty-five barons and those twenty-five barons together with the community of the whole land shall distrain and distress us in every way they can, namely, by seizing castles, lands, possessions, and in such other ways as they can, saving our person and the persons of our queen and our children, until, in their opinion, amends have been made; and when amends have been made, they shall obey us as they did before. And let anyone in the land who wishes take an oath to obey the orders of the said twenty-five barons for the execution of all the aforesaid matters, and with them to distress us as much as he can, and we publicly and freely give anyone leave to take the oath who wishes to take it and we will never prohibit anyone from taking it. Indeed, all those in the land who are unwilling of themselves and of their own accord to take an oath to the twenty-five barons to help them to distrain and distress us, we will make them take the oath as aforesaid at our command. And if any of the twenty-five barons dies or leaves the country or is in any other way prevented from carrying out the things aforesaid, the rest of the aforesaid twenty-five barons shall choose as they think fit another one in his place, and he shall take the oath like the rest. In all matters the execution of which is committed to these twenty-five barons, if it should happen that these twenty-five are present yet disagree among themselves about anything, or if some of those summoned will not or cannot be present, that shall be held as fixed and established which the majority of those present ordained or commanded, exactly as if all the twenty-five had consented to it; and the said twenty-five shall swear that they will faithfully observe all the things aforesaid and will do all they can to get them observed. And we will procure nothing from anyone, either personally or through anyone else, whereby any of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such thing is procured, let it be void and null, and we will never use it either personally or through another.


SBC issuing their own warrants ?

further to the last post, the two officers turned up on land south of scoggers hill accompanied by four constables and a fraudulent warrant.

all six, behaved as if their actions were above board and normal. which raises serious questions regarding a culture of blind co-operation with fraudulent criminal activity.

upon investigation it would appear that the conspiracy of collusion includes all involved parties: the council, the constabulary and the judiciary.

unless otherwise shown, the ‘warrant’ was issued without any of the protocols or procedures (designed for good reason, to prevent miscarriages of justice), been in place and correctly exercised.


abuse of power by SBC officers ?



it is very concerning to recently discover the lengths that swale borough council officers are prepared to go to, to force their unwarranted interference upon some folk in the faversham area.

we refer to planning department public servants who appear to have got the cart before the horse and going to some seriously devious measures to achieve their highly questionable goal.

why would the planning department attempt to misuse a law designed to deal with terrorist issues.

we can find no factual connection between what the planning department say they are trying to achieve and the use of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 section 9/10

to date the council has failed to address questions contained in a recorded notice delivered on the 8th Sept 2016 to the CEO of SBC



whats going on

anyone know what is going on at the ex furniture factory on the graveney road just out of town and why such an important large project has not been brought to the attention of the local folk and discussed. is this a case of ineptitude or something else unknown ?